Rise: Rest-ing heterogeneous simulations interoperability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interoperating heterogeneous simulation models and tools is becoming a necessity in today's cross-enterprise collaboration market. Nevertheless, simulation models and engines have evolved apart in many directions, making their interoperability extremely complex. We present the RESTful Interoperability Simulation Environment (RISE), which provides the means for interoperating simulation heterogeneous assets. RISE uses Service-Oriented RESTful web-services, and it is based on three aspects: the framework architecture, the modeling level and the simulation synchronization level. RISE is independent of any simulation engine, theory or an algorithm. However, it provides different rules for simulation domains with conservative or optimistic synchronization algorithms. Further, RISE does not require any implementation changes related to domain modeling or simulation methods. Furthermore, it hides domain internal specifics, giving freedom to define different internal implementation and algorithms. The presented work here is part of the on-going effort in the DEVS community to interoperate different DEVS-based simulation assets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it