MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3147962482 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.05237

Application of an unbalanced optimal transport distance and a mixed L1/Wasserstein distance to full waveform inversion

2020· preprint· en· W3147962482 on OpenAlexafffund
Da Li, Michael P. Lamoureux, Wenyuan Liao

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematical optimizationAmplitudeMathematicsInversion (geology)AlgorithmEntropy (arrow of time)Applied mathematicsComputer sciencePhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Full waveform inversion (FWI) is an important and popular technique in subsurface earth property estimation. However, using the least-squares norm in the misfit function often leads to the local minimum solution of the optimization problem, and this phenomenon can be explained with the cycle-skipping artifact. Several methods that apply optimal transport distances to mitigate the cycle-skipping artifact have been proposed recently. The optimal transport distance is designed to compare two probability measures. To overcome the mass equality limit, we introduce an unbalanced optimal transport (UOT) distance with KullbackLeibler divergence to balance the mass difference. Also, a mixed L1/Wasserstein distance is constructed that can preserve the convex properties with respect to shift, dilation, and amplitude change operation. An entropy regularization approach and scaling algorithms are used to compute the distance and the gradient efficiently. Two strategies of normalization methods that transform the seismic signals into non-negative functions are provided. Numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the new method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)→Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→