MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3147999427 · doi:10.1142/s2047684120500232

Refining anticipation of degraded bone microstructures during osteoporosis based on statistical homogenized reconstruction method via quality of connection function

2020· article· en· W3147999427 on OpenAlex
Seyedfarzad Famouri, Amirhossein Bagherian, Armin Shahmohammadi, Daniel George, Mostafa Baghani, Majid Baniassadi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Computational Materials Science and Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersMinistry of Science Research and Technology
KeywordsComputer scienceOsteoporosisInterpolation (computer graphics)Volume fractionFunction (biology)Statistical modelAlgorithmQuality (philosophy)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceMotion (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, osteoporosis disease that is related to aging has become a proliferating problem in worldwide society. It is therefore crucial to understand its evolution and predict this phenomenon precisely for different types of bone and volume fractions with adequate mathematical model. The application of statistical reconstruction method would be a helpful tool to predict osteoporosis for the simplified bone microstructures. To model osteoporosis evolution over time, in a first step, we propose to degrade the volume fraction with a mathematical model to reach any determined volume fraction between the initial condition and the degraded one with a statistical interpolation. In a second step, the degraded microstructure will be optimized using a statistical descriptor. The final optimized microstructures will be discussed as a function of the effective mechanical properties. The capability of quality of connection and two-point correlation functions (TPCFs) in 3D models and their application in the optimization of reconstructed interpolated models are going to be demonstrated. Finally, we will demonstrate and discuss the advantages of using the Quality of Connection Function (QCF) as a replacement of TPCF over the sole statistical descriptor named TPCF. We will show that QCF descriptor is better than TPCF only to find the optimized reconstructed models in a determined volume fraction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.222
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it