Efficient block-based parameterized timing analysis covering all potentially critical paths
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order for the results of timing analysis to be useful, they must provide insight and guidance on how the circuit may be improved so as to fix any reported timing problems. A limitation of many recent variability-aware timing analysis techniques is that, while they report delay distributions, or verify multiple corners, they do not provide the required guidance for re-design. We propose an efficient block-based parameterized timing analysis technique that can accurately capture circuit delay at every point in the parameter space, by reporting all paths that can become critical. Using an efficient pruning algorithm, only those potentially critical paths are carried forward, while all other paths are discarded during propagation. This allows one to examine local robustness to parameters in different regions of the parameter space, not by considering differential sensitivity at a point (which would be useless in this context) but by knowledge of the paths that can become critical at nearby points in parameter space. We give a formal definition of this problem and propose a technique for solving it that improves on the state of the art, both in terms of theoretical computational complexity and in terms of run time on various test circuits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".