MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3148157447

The Development of Production-Based Learning Approach to Entrepreneurial Spirit for Engineering Students

2013· article· en· W3148157447 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVocational and Entrepreneurial Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVocational educationWorkforceWork (physics)EntrepreneurshipProcess (computing)Production (economics)Order (exchange)Field (mathematics)Quality (philosophy)PsychologySociologyPedagogyMathematics educationKnowledge managementComputer scienceEngineeringBusinessPolitical scienceMechanical engineeringEconomicsMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractVocational education aims to produce workforce. However, in reality there is a shiftthat vocational graduates are not only prepared to work but also they are expected to open or create new work opportunity. To overcome mentioned educated employment, we offer an alternative solution to integrate production based with learning process; outcome would be entrepreneurial ability of engineering students. The results of this study showed that implementation of production based learning with entrepreneurship approach using workshop based lectures, qualitatively improved quality and meaningfulness of learning. The learning experience which connects interns and works or work products is indeed in line with field specification and standard. The learning process has given impact to entrepreneurial interest improvement assessed in beginning and at end of semester. Besides that, learning activity gives impacts to cognitive discourse, psychomotor skill, and work attitude improvement build integrally. Thus, model is deemed suitable to be utilized in learning to improve students' entrepreneurial interest.Keywords: learning, production, entrepreneurship1. IntroductionVocational education is education that prepares students especially for work in specific areas (Law No. 20 of 2003, article 15). The Mission of vocational education is also preparing learners to be able to deal with changes in community especially for working in a particular field. Jama and Adri (2010) states that the Vocational education should be responsive to changes in society. In this era of rapid change of technology, vocational education must play many important roles in order to take roles in world of work. In addition, vocational education is demanded to produce a competent workforce in order to increase productivity and efficiency as well as readiness for international labor market competition in era of globalization.According to BPS data of February 2012, noted number of unemployment in Indonesia reached 7.61 million. This number has decreased significantly compared to number of unemployed in August 2011 reaching 7.7 million. While in February 2011, unemployment amounting to 8.14 million people with 4% Diploma graduates (304,000) and 5.7% Bachelors degree graduates (434,000). In view of this numbers of unemployed graduates, there is no exception in implementation of learning process at Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP), Indonesia, which still generates its output from individual skills and still has not touched on aspects of learning outcomes which focused on entrepreneurship ability. Thus, currently, university graduates generated are job seekers, not creators of employment. Efforts need to be done to overcome increasing number of well-educated unemployment by preparing graduates who have a soul of entrepreneurship. The entrepreneurial skill is an alternative solution to resolve problem of unemployment and poverty that is by opening employment or entrepreneurship.Entrepreneurship is separated from world of education. Thus to be able to continue learning, University needs alternative solutions by integrating value on entrepreneurship in learning process through development of production-based learning model. The concept is being offered in learning process for each material whereby University students are able to produce products that are innovative and creative as well as acceptable for market through stages of logical and meticulous analysis, which further processed into creative new ideas, innovative and accepted in market both in terms of planning skills, decision skills & execution skill. The development of production-based learning model will be able to enhance entrepreneurship passion of students and graduates of Faculty of Engineering of UNP. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicVocational and Entrepreneurial EducationFrench-language works237,207