MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3148267813 · doi:10.1137/20m1319127

Convergence to Periodic Probability Solutions in Fokker--Planck Equations

2021· article· en· W3148267813 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaJilin UniversityUniversity of AlbertaPacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences
KeywordsFokker–Planck equationUniquenessConvergence (economics)MathematicsPlanckSubject (documents)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisPartial differential equationComputer sciencePhysicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Related DatabasesWeb of Science You must be logged in with an active subscription to view this.Article DataHistorySubmitted: 18 February 2020Accepted: 12 January 2021Published online: 08 April 2021KeywordsFokker--Planck equation, periodic probability solution, uniqueness, convergenceAMS Subject HeadingsPrimary, 35Q84; Secondary, 35J25, 37B25, 60J60Publication DataISSN (print): 0036-1410ISSN (online): 1095-7154Publisher: Society for Industrial and Applied MathematicsCODEN: sjmaah

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it