Moving Beyond Tradition: Technologies Facilitating Students' Cognitive Ability and Modifying Pedagogical Practices of School Librarians in Jamaica and Antigua
Bibliographic record
Abstract
School library collections in Jamaica and Antigua have moved beyond the traditional print-only collection to various technologies that facilitate teaching and learning. Some of these technologies are not directly located in the library but are placed in computer labs where the school librarians have access to them. This research was conducted to determine what types of technologies were used in the libraries studied, how they facilitated students’ cognitive skills, and how they modified school librarians’ pedagogical practices. The sample consisted of 52 school librarians in Jamaica and Antigua. The findings showed that participants had or had access to technologies such as multimedia projectors, interactive SMART Boards, computers with and without internet access, and tablets. These technologies facilitated students’ cognitive behavior by providing them with additional content, and promoted active learning, among other things. Participants’ pedagogical practices were modified as they now deliver instruction using PowerPoint, blogs, Twitter, Facebook, podcasts, and e-books.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".