Patriation and its consequences : constitution making in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part 1: Introduction: The Significance of Constitution Making 1 Looking Back on Patriation and Its Consequences / Lois Harder and Steve Patten 2 Constituting Constitutions: The Patriation Moment / Janine Brodie Part 2: Tracing the Long Road to Patriation 3 Constitutional Nationalism: Politics, Law, and Culture on the Road to Patriation / Eric M. Adams 4 The Evolution of the Charter / Barry L. Strayer 5 The Rise of Spectator Constitutionalism, 1967-81 / P.E. Bryden Part 3: Shaping Patriation: Law, Political Vision, Political Actors, and Political Struggle 6 Law, Politics, and the Patriation Reference of 1981 / Philip Girard 7 The Judiciary in Trudeau's Constitutional Vision: Intellectual Trajectory and Origins of the Charter / David Schneiderman 8 More Distress than Enchantment: The Constitutional Negotiations of November 1981 Seen from Quebec / Guy Laforest and Rosalie Readman 9 Tracking Justice: The Constitution Express to Section 35 and Beyond / Louise Mandell and Leslie Hall Pinder 10 28 - Helluva Lot to Lose in 27 Days: The Ad Hoc Committee and Women's Constitutional Activism in the Era of Patriation / Marilou McPhedran, Judith Erola, and Loren Braul Part 4: The Political and Constitutional Consequences of Patriation 11 Patriation and the Law of Unintended Consequences / Peter Russell 12 Canadian Federalism since Patriation: Advancing a Federalism of Empowerment / Alain-G. Gagnon and Alex Schwartz 13 An Indigenous Constitutional Paradox: Both Monumental Achievement and Monumental Defeat / Kiera Ladner 14 The Sad but True Story of a Shrinking Equality Opportunity Structure / Alexandra Dobrowolsky List of Contributors Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.034 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".