Influences of HCI Regime on Determination Results of Routine Smoke Components of Super Slim Cigarettes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In order to study the influences of Health Canada Intense(HCI)regime on the deliveries of tar,nicotine and carbon monoxide(CO) in mainstream smoke of super slim cigarettes,a collaborative study involving 7 rotary smoking machines and 5 linear smoking machines in 9 laboratories was carried out by smoking 4 super slim cigarette brands under ISO and HCI regimes respectively. The results showed that:1)The influences of HCI regime on the deliveries of tar,nicotine and CO were basically the same. 2)Under HCI regime,the deliveries of tar,nicotine and CO increased with the decrease of tar delivery determined under ISO regime and/or with the increase of ventilation rate of cigarette filter. 3) Comparing with ISO regime,the repeatability(r)and reproducibility(R)of tar and nicotine determination results,the repeatability(r)of CO determination results and the relative reproducibility(R/m)of tar determination results under HCI regime were higher,which indicated that the precision of HCI regime for tar,nicotine and CO determination results was lower than that of ISO regime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".