On optimizing machine learning workloads via kernel fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exploitation of parallel architectures has become critical to scalable machine learning (ML). Since a wide range of ML algorithms employ linear algebraic operators, GPUs with BLAS libraries are a natural choice for such an exploitation. Two approaches are commonly pursued: (i) developing specific GPU accelerated implementations of complete ML algorithms; and (ii) developing GPU kernels for primitive linear algebraic operators like matrix-vector multiplication, which are then used in developing ML algorithms. This paper extends the latter approach by developing fused kernels for a combination of primitive operators that are commonly found in popular ML algorithms. We identify the generic pattern of computation (alpha * X^T (v * (X * y)) + beta * z) and its various instantiations. We develop a fused kernel to optimize this computation on GPUs -- with specialized techniques to handle both sparse and dense matrices. This approach not only reduces the cost of data loads due to improved temporal locality but also enables other optimizations like coarsening and hierarchical aggregation of partial results. We also present an analytical model that considers input data characteristics and available GPU resources to estimate near-optimal settings for kernel launch parameters. The proposed approach provides speedups ranging from 2 to 67 for different instances of the generic pattern compared to launching multiple operator-level kernels using GPU accelerated libraries. We conclude by demonstrating the effectiveness of the approach in improving end-to-end performance on an entire ML algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".