MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3148594927 · doi:10.3917/cdlj.2101.0111

Robert Falco, exclu sous Vichy parce que Juif, puis juge des criminels nazis à Nuremberg

2021· article· fr· W3148594927 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Paul Jean

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de la Justice · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitut d'Histoire de l'Amérique Française
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNazismHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Robert Falco (1882-1960) a connu un destin exceptionnel. Homme de culture, avocat puis brillant magistrat du parquet, il a été exclu par le Régime de Vichy en 1940 parce que Juif. Réintégré à la Libération, il a négocié pour la France les accords de Londres créant le Tribunal militaire international avant de siéger à Nuremberg comme juge adjoint dans le procès des dignitaires nazis. Son Journal , publié en 2012, constitue un témoignage inédit du procès, vu de l'intérieur. Robert Falco termina sa carrière à la Cour de cassation où il fût le rapporteur inspiré de l'arrêt de révision de la condamnation de Baudelaire en 1857 pour Les fleurs du mal .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de la JusticeSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207