MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3148770224

Exploiting Data Characteristics in The Design of Accelerators for Deep Learning

2019· dissertation· W3148770224 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Judd

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2019
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceData scienceComputer architecture
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent “Cambrian explosion” of Deep Learning (DL) algorithms in concert with the end of Moore’s Law and Dennard Scaling has spurred interest in the design of custom hardware accelerators for DL algorithms. While DL has progressed quickly thanks in part to the abundance of efficient parallel computation provided by General Purpose Graphics Processing Units, newer DL algorithms demand even higher levels of compute density and efficiency. Furthermore, applications of DL in the mobile and embedded domains demand the energy efficiency of special purpose hardware. DL algorithms are dominated by large matrix-vector product computations, making them ideal targets for wide Single Instruction Multiple Data architectures. For the most part, efficiently mapping the structure of these computations to hardware is straightforward. Building on such designs, this thesis examines the data characteristics of these computations and proposes hardware modifications to exploit them for performance and energy efficiency. Specifically, this thesis examines the sparsity and precision requirements of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, which comprise multiple layers of matrix-vector product computations. We propose a profiling method to find per layer reduced precision configurations while maintaining high classification accuracy. Following this, we propose three accelerator designs that build on top of the state-of-the-art DaDianNao accelerator. 1) Proteus exploits the reduced precision profiles by adding a light weight memory compression layer, saving energy in memory access and communication, and enabling larger networks in a fixed memory budget. 2) Cnvlutin exploits the presence of zero, and near zero, values in the inter-layer data by applying sparse compression to the data stream while maintain efficient utilization of the wide memory and compute structure of the SIMD accelerator. 3) Stripes exploits the reduced precision profiles for performance by processing data bit-serially, compensating for serial latency by exploiting the abundant parallelism in the convolution operation. All three designs exploit approximation, in terms of reduced precision and computation skipping to improve energy efficiency and/or performance while maintaining high classification accuracy. By approximating more aggressively, these designs can also dynamically trade-off accuracy for further improvements in performance and energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→