L’INTENTION D’UTILISER LE PRÉSERVATIF FÉMININ AU CAMEROUN : UNE ANALYSE DU COMPORTEMENT PLANIFIÉ
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude menée au Cameroun, auprès de 1 944 femmes et hommes, essaie de prédire l’intention d’utiliser le préservatif féminin. Les résultats indiquent que les deux sexes réalisent de faibles scores d’intention, notamment en matière de croyances, de préférence du préservatif masculin au Fémidon, de valorisation sociale, de normes subjectives, et de contrôle comportemental perçu. Par ailleurs, des variables, habituellement absentes dans les modèles de l’action raisonnée et du comportement planifié, peuvent améliorer leur valeur prédictive. Même si le sexe explique une part significative de la variation de l’intention, cette part reste par ailleurs moins importante que celles de certaines variables sociodémographiques. On se demande si ce n’est pas à elles, plutôt qu’à la femme, à qui il est prioritairement destiné, qu’il faut adresser le Fémidon.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".