Facial Expression Recognition Using a Simplified Convolutional Neural Network Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Facial Expression Recognition (FER) is one of the most important information channels by which Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) systems can recognize human emotions. The importance of FER is not limited to the direct interaction between the machine and humans but can be extended to security, virtual reality, education, and entertainment. In this paper, we propose two Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models for FER. One of these models achieved 100% accuracy for the JAFFE and CK+ benchmark datasets with lower computational complexity. We applied image augmentation techniques and image enhancement techniques with the first model. The other CNN model is an extended version of the first model that h as been validated for t he more challenging FER2013 dataset and we obtained 69.32% for this dataset. By comparing to the recent state-of-the-art approaches to FER, we demonstrate the superior accuracy and efficiency of the proposed approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it