Towards real-time simulation of construction activities considering spatio-temporal resolution requirements for improving safety and productivity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional simulation models use statistical data to estimate task durations. However, to make the simulation results more realistic and reflecting the changes during the task execution, real-time simulation has been suggested by several researchers. On the other hand, little consideration is given to spatio-temporal constraints in simulation models. Several spatial modeling methods, such as maps, grids and 3D models, have been used in construction simulation. However, different resolutions of spatio-temporal representations should be used based on the specific requirements when considering spatio-temporal conflicts. The present paper aims to propose the basic concept of real-time simulation of construction activities considering spatio-temporal resolution requirements for improving safety and productivity. The objectives of the paper are: (1) to review real-time simulation methods of construction activities considering spatio-temporal conflicts; (2) to investigate the spatio-temporal requirements in the real-time simulation environment; and (3) to investigate the integration of simulation models at different spatio-temporal resolutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".