MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sensor and Actuator Fault Isolation Using Parameter Interval based Method for Nonlinear Dynamic Systems

2010· article· en· W3149130192 on OpenAlexaff
Zetao Li, B. Dahhou, Gilles Roux, Jing Yang, Cuixia Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Conference of the PHM Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nautical Research Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorControl theory (sociology)Interval (graph theory)Nonlinear systemFault detection and isolationIsolation (microbiology)Computer scienceFault (geology)Interval arithmeticControl engineeringMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceGeologyMathematical analysisBiologyControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fault isolation problem for sensor and actuator in nonlinear dynamic systems is studied. Parame- ter interval based fault isolation method has fast isolation speed and fits many kinds of nonlinear dynamic systems. This method is extended to the isolation of sensor fault and actuator fault. The example shows good performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnual Conference of the PHM SocietySame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207