MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3149352661 · doi:10.1080/00207543.2021.1902013

Integrated production-inventory-routing problem for multi-perishable products under uncertainty by meta-heuristic algorithms

2021· article· en· W3149352661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Production Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceProduction (economics)Profit (economics)Vehicle routing problemInteger programmingFuzzy logicDifferential evolutionRouting (electronic design automation)Operations researchMathematicsEconomicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study aims to introduce an integrated production-inventory-routing problem (PIRP) with a mixed-integer linear programming model, remarking a multi-perishable product, multi-period, and heterogeneous fleets with time windows in a distribution network. The objective of the proposed model is to maximise the total profit, which equals the selling revenue subtract the aggregation of the holding, production, transportation, and utility preference costs. At the production level, a multi-period production system with production capacity constraints is considered, in which the inventory at each stage of production is intended to compute the related holding costs and schedule more appropriate planning. The vehicle routing problem is tackled at the distribution level regarding vehicles with various capacities in a multi-period condition. Consequently, a fuzzy chance-constrained programming model is used to deal with fuzzy parameters. Furthermore, two evolutionary algorithms, namely a hybrid imperialist competitive algorithm (HICA) and self-adaptive differential evolution (SADE), are proposed to solve the given problem. Subsequently, several numerical examples with managerial insights are solved to evaluate the performances of the proposed algorithms and show their effectiveness and efficiency. Computational results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithms for this problem. Finally, the applicability of the proposed algorithms is investigated by a real-case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it