MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3149353857 · doi:10.1017/9781108647847.017

Black Activism, Print Culture, and Literature in Canada, 1850–1865

2021· book-chapter· en· W3149353857 on OpenAlexaffabout
Winfried Siemerling

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmigrationPleaNewspaperWindsorPrint cultureDiasporaPolitical scienceHistoryMedia studiesGender studiesGenealogyLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter documents and explores Black activism, print culture, and literature in Canada West. In response to the Compromise of 1850, Canada West sees the North American Convention of Colored Freemen held in Toronto (September 10, 1851), the emigration of Mary Ann Shadd to Windsor – where she will publish A Plea for Emigration (1852) and her newspaper, The Provincial Freeman (1853–9) – and John Brown’s visit seeking to “legitimize his projects in the United States by obtaining an endorsement from the Black community in Chatham.” As Siemerling puts it, at mid-century Chatham had become “one of the secret capitals of Black North America.” In his larger argument for reading a rich tradition of Black writing in Canada West contrapuntally as both transnational and part of a national Canadian tradition, he also draws our attention to how important Canada West was as both an emigration site and one in which to imagine and plan the staging of revolution. Siemerling is careful to note that Canada West should be considered not only a transnational space but, importantly, also a national space in which these practices of Black geography counter ongoing attempts to “insistently exteriorize Blackness from Canada.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0340.016
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooks→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→