MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3149529417 · doi:10.1002/batt.202100068

Lithium Metal Anode: Processing and Interface Engineering

2021· article· en· W3149529417 on OpenAlex
Stefan Kaskel, Qiang Zhang, Xueliang Sun

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBatteries & Supercaps · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeNanotechnologyCommercializationLithium metalEnergy storageLithium (medication)Materials scienceEngineering physicsComputer scienceEngineeringChemistryBusinessPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Making a comeback: After falling into oblivion for some decades, the use of metallic Li for next-generation Li batteries has become a hot topic in the last few years. This special collection features review-type and original articles providing new insights into state-of-the-art technologies for system integration using metallic Li. Targeting higher energy density and higher specific energy, the introduction of the lithium metal anode in working batteries is among the key challenges and aims for energy storage applications that require higher energy densities, such as next-generation urban mobility and electric aircrafts. The global significant research across the world is addressing this topic for a wide range of cathodes and cell types. Not only oxide-based cathodes but also sulfur batteries and emerging energy chemistries are enabled by the lithium metal anode. For all-solid-state batteries lithium metal anodes are fundamental. Research progress in both academia and industry has led to emerging enterprises and systems on the verge of commercialization. However, many fundamental challenges remain: dendritic or mossy lithium growth, dead lithium formation, irreversible electrolyte consumption, etc., need to be suppressed. Both chemical and mechanical factors are interconnected and lead to complex degradation phenomena. The high reactivity of the metal surface hampers progress in understanding and commercial implementation. Exploring such technologies requires interdisciplinary approaches covering interface design, electrolyte innovation, understanding dendrite suppression, the development of porous hosts and many more. Moreover, modeling such complex interfaces by in silico design is still in a state of infancy. The current Special Collection features 5 reviews and 8 original articles affords new insights into state-of-the-art technologies for system integration. Park and co-workers highlight the decisive role of interface engineering in his review (10.1002/batt.202000016), whereas Nojabaee et al. provide a more fundamental view of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation on lithium metal anodes. Brandell and co-workers give insights into surface analysis of lithium-sulfur batteries through in depth XPS insights. In contrast, Tao and co-workers demonstrate how polysulfides can be blocked from the anode using MXene coatings. Kang et al. elaborate further in their review on the deliberate control of artificial SEI formation. The minireview by Zhang and co-workers addresses important benefits of garnet coatings as interfacial layers. As an alternative to traditional chemical approaches, Rangasamy and Vanhulsel highlight the potential of plasma surface processing for interfacial control. Several additional original articles in this Special Collection demonstrate the continuous scientific progress in this timely field defying the pandemic. The major trends are focusing on controlling lithium deposition and interfacial control. An example is the contribution by Liu and co-workers, in which lithium deposition is regulated by coating copper current collectors. One of the most advanced lithium metal batteries in terms of understanding and technology readiness level is based on the lithium sulfur system. Another major area of research are solid state batteries, for example, Zhang and co-workers describe the all-solid-state batteries with slurry-coated sulfur/sulfide cathode, Li and Nan's group presented the role of residual solvent in the PVDF based electrolyte in working batteries, and Ye and co-workersYe and co-workers probed the role of ionic liquid in the triazine frameworks-based quasi-solid-state electrolyte. Lithium sulfur battery technology is also advanced worldwide while the Li metal protection is quite the challenge. Kaskel and co-workers found the addition of polysulfides decreases and stabilizes the overpotential in Li/Li cells and therefore delays the cell degradation. The application of composite Li metal anode and Li alloy is strongly considered. Herein, Li and co-workers present the fast Li+ transport of Li−Zn alloy protective layer. There is plenty of space in the field of processing and interface engineering of Li metal anodes in future. The Special Collection nicely illustrates the current status, challenges and future directions in the emerging field of lithium metal anode technology. To close, we would like to express our sincere thanks to the editorial team of Batteries & Supercaps, in particular Dr. Rosalba A. Rincón and Dr. Greta Heydenrych. All the authors and reviewers are highly appreciated for their great contribution to this high-quality collection. Stefan Kaskel studied chemistry and received his Ph.D. degree in 1997 at Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen (Germany). As a Feodor-Lynen Fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt foundation he worked with John Corbett at Ames Laboratory, USA (1998–2000) on intermetallic compounds. He was a group leader at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung in Mülheim a.d. Ruhr (2000-2004) in the group of Ferdi Schüth and after his habilitation at Ruhr University (Bochum) in 2004 in the area of heterogeneous catalysis, he became full professor for Inorganic Chemistry at Technical University Dresden. Since 2008 he is also business field leader at Fraunhofer IWS, Dresden. His research interests are focused on porous and nanostructured materials (synthesis, structure, function) for applications in energy storage, batteries, catalysis, and separation technologies. Qiang Zhang received his B.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees from Tsinghua University in 2004 and 2009 and then he stayed at the Case Western Reserve University, USA, and the Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, Germany. He was appointed as a faculty member at Tsinghua University in 2011. He held the Newton Advanced Fellowship from Royal Society, UK and the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars. His current research interests are advanced energy materials, including lithium metal anode, lithium sulfur/oxygen batteries, and electrocatalysis. Andy (Xueliang) Sun is a Full Professor and senior Canada Research Chair (Tier I) at the University of Western Ontario, Canada. He is a Fellow of Royal Society of Canada and Fellow of the Canadian Academy of Engineering. He received his Ph.D. degree in Materials Chemistry at the University of Manchester, UK, in 1999. His research is focused on advanced materials for energy conversion and storage including Li batteries and fuel cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it