MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3149582019 · doi:10.1353/can.2005.0154

Canada and the End of Empire (review)

2005· article· en· W3149582019 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
David MacKenzie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpireCommonwealthBritish EmpireHistoryEconomic historyAncient historyClassicsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Canada and the End of Empire David Mackenzie Canada and the End of Empire. Philip Buckner, ed. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2004. Pp. 334. $29.95 When did the British Empire end in Canada? This is the central question in this new collection of essays, the product of a 2001 conference at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies in London. In his Introduction, editor Phillip Buckner reminds us of the importance of English Canada's 'Britishness' and the role Canadians played in the evolution of the empire, and how nationalists and others have either ignored the imperial dimension in Canadian history or viewed the imperial relationship as 'a handicap that prevented Canada from reaching its potential.' The eighteen chapters collected here try to set the record straight. Not unexpectedly, no single answer to the central question is provided. Two chapters on the Suez Crisis and two more on the 1964 flag debate suggest that these were key moments but, as Buckner writes, 'there was no magic day on which all Canadians came to accept that the empire was over.' Nevertheless, he suggests that the decade between 1956 and 1967 was the 'critical period.' The first half of the book takes a traditional approach through an examination of Anglo-Canadian diplomatic and economic relations. John Hilliker and Greg Donaghy look at Anglo-Canadian relations from the Suez Crisis to 1973, José Igartua focuses on the way the Suez Crisis was perceived by Canadian newspapers, Tim Rooth, Bruce Muirhead, and Steve Koerner analyse different aspects of Anglo-Canadian trade and demonstrate how the numbers declined everywhere in the face of American and Japanese competition, Gordon Stewart looks at the end of [End Page 716] empire from an American perspective, and Buckner examines Queen Elizabeth's 1959 royal tour. A reccurring theme here is not that Canada left the empire but that the empire left Canada, with the British decolonizing and moving rapidly into a European context, acting independently of the empire in Suez and elsewhere, while the Canadians watched from the sidelines, usually unhappy and cross with the British for what they had done. In one of the most interesting chapters, Andrea Benvenuti and Stuart Ward pick up on José Igartua's phrase, the 'Other Quiet Revolution,' and argue that Britain's movement into Europe in the 1950s and 1960s created a kind of vacuum that forced English-Canadians to re-examine their own identity. The chapters in the second half of the volume are a little more eclectic. P.E. Bryden showcases Ontario's role in the constitutional debates in the 1950s and 1960s, Paul Rutherford and Allan Smith make the connection between culture and the end of empire, Marc Milner surveys the Royal Canadian Navy's search for identity from 1910 to 1968, R. Douglas Francis connects the ideas of Harold Innis and George Grant to 'empire' in a general way, Gregory Johnson and Lorraine Coops analyse the flag debate, and J.R. Miller examines how First Nations Organizations petitioned the 'Great White Mother' through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. These essays differ in style and quality, and the focus of at least a couple of them wanders considerably from the central question of Canada and the end of empire. There are also a few gaps, which Buckner acknowledges in his Introduction, but acknowledgement alone cannot cover the holes. Quebec/French-Canada is largely missing and, more importantly, there are no chapters on Canada's changing immigration policy or demographics. Surely the arrival of thousands of non-British immigrants and the appearance of a large younger generation of baby boomers fed on American television and hamburgers had more to do with the end of the empire in Canada than the debate over the flag. The latter event – like others examined in this volume – can be seen more as the result than the cause of the end of empire. Clearly the empire in Canada is over, and these essays help explain why it happened. Britain's retreat from empire cut Canadians loose in an increasingly American environment and forced them to seek new ways to define themselves. But had the British remained committed to the empire, or at least the Commonwealth...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.014
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207