Effects of historical land cover changes on climate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
为了探索人为的土地的影响，在最后千年期间在气候系统上使用，一套实验与中间的复杂性的一个地球系统模型一起被执行 -- McGill 古气候模型(MPM-2 ) 。现在的纸主要在简历上集中历史的陆地盖子变化的地球物理的效果。采伐森林的一种动态情形在农田部分(RF99 ) 基于变化被描述。模型在 0.09-0.16 deg C 的范围在全球吝啬的年度温度模仿减少，在北半球的特别 0.14-0.22 deg C 在最后 300 年期间。到 GHG 集中变化的气候系统的回答也为比较被计算。现在，造林为陆上的碳隐遁和地区性的气候的调整的改进正在成为一种重要选择。结果显示那份简历陆地盖子变化的地球物理的效果不能在对气候的评价被忽视变化。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".