MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3149709306 · doi:10.4000/transposition.5517

Barbara L. Kelly, Christopher Moore (eds.), Music Criticism in France, 1918-1939. Authority, Advocacy, Legacy

2021· article· en· W3149709306 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Florence Huybrechts

Bibliographic record

VenueTransposition · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCriticismPolitical scienceArtArt historyMedia studiesLawSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résultat d’un workshop international (Ottawa, 2011) unissant les efforts de chercheurs de pays et d’horizons disciplinaires variés, ce recueil de 12 études se veut une première enquête approfondie sur la critique et les critiques musicaux de l’entre-deux-guerres français. Il témoigne de l’engouement récent ayant présidé, de part et d’autre de l’Atlantique, à la formation de collectifs de recherche, lesquels ont contribué à faire passer la presse et la critique musicales françaises d’un réserv...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranspositionSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207