MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3149727994 · doi:10.1111/ene.14860

Prevalence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of Guillain−Barré syndrome spectrum associated with COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021· review· en· W3149727994 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Neurology · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioGuillain-Barre syndromeConfidence intervalMeta-analysisInternal medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PediatricsDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and purpose Mounting evidence supports an association between Guillain−Barré syndrome spectrum (GBSs) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. However, GBSs in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) remains poorly characterized, whilst GBSs prevalence amongst COVID‐19 patients has not been previously systematically evaluated using a meta‐analytical approach. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational cohort and case series studies reporting on the occurrence, clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID‐19‐associated GBSs was performed. A random‐effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates and odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), compared to non‐COVID‐19, contemporary or historical GBSs patients. Results Eighteen eligible studies (11 cohorts, seven case series) were identified including a total of 136,746 COVID‐19 patients. Amongst COVID‐19 patients, including hospitalized and non‐hospitalized cases, the pooled GBSs prevalence was 0.15‰ (95% CI 0%–0.49‰; I 2 = 96%). Compared with non‐infected contemporary or historical controls, patients with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection had increased odds for demyelinating GBSs subtypes (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.32%–8.09%; I 2 = 0%). In SARS‐CoV‐2‐infected patients, olfactory or concomitant cranial nerve involvement was noted in 41.4% (95% CI 3.5%–60.4%; I 2 = 46%) and 42.8% (95% CI 32.8%–53%; I 2 = 0%) of the patients, respectively. Clinical outcomes including in‐hospital mortality were comparable between COVID‐19 GBSs patients and non‐infected contemporary or historical GBSs controls. Conclusion GBSs prevalence was estimated at 15 cases per 100,000 SARS‐CoV‐2 infections. COVID‐19 appears to be associated with an increased likelihood of GBSs and with demyelinating GBSs variants in particular.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0130.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it