MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3149930999

Acoustic propagation in an Arctic shallow-water environment

2003· article· en· W3149930999 on OpenAlexaff
Francine Desharnais, Garry J. Heard, Gordon R. Ebbeson, David J. Thomson, Douglas J. Schillinger, R. Seyan

Bibliographic record

VenueOceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyWaves and shallow waterTransmission lossSeabedHydrophoneBroadbandAcousticsChannel (broadcasting)PermafrostRemote sensingSeismologyOceanographyTelecommunicationsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A short-range, shallow-water transmission loss experiment was conducted in the South Lincoln Sea, under an irregular rough ice canopy. A barrel-stave source was used to transmit 800-Hz tonal signals at depths of 10 and 30 m. The signals were received on a four-element vertical line array distributed over the 65-m water depth. To support the transmission loss measurements, a bottom loss experiment was carried out using broadband signals generated by imploding light bulbs at three depths and with data received on the same hydrophone array. Previous drilling experiments in the vicinity of this site have provided seabed information and revealed the presence of a subbottom permafrost layer. Preliminary modeling of the acoustic propagation in this highly irregular channel was carried out using a wave-based model. This paper reviews the measurements, and discusses the challenges associated with the modeling, in view of the experimental uncertainties associated with this complicated environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.236
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOceans 2003. Celebrating the Past ... Teaming Toward the Future (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37492)Same topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207