MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3150024363

Continuous Detonation Engine and Effects of Different Types of Nozzle on Its Propulsion Performance

2010· article· en· W3150024363 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shao Shao, Yetao, Liu, Meng Meng, Wang, Jianping

Bibliographic record

Venue中国航空学报:英文版 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropulsionDetonationNozzleAutomotive engineeringAeronauticsEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringEngineeringChemistryExplosive material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

有嘴的不同类型的一台连续爆炸引擎(CDE ) 的旋转繁殖用一个一步舞化学药品反应模型在三维的数字模拟被调查。流动术语被所谓的保存 monotonicity 解决加权实质上非摆动(MPWENO ) 计划。模仿的流动地与以前的试验性的结果同意很好。一旦起始的短暂效果减弱,只要燃料连续地被注射,爆炸波浪在环形的房间维持连续摆动的繁殖。用一块数字流动地, CDE 的推进表演为嘴的四种类型被计算,也就是经常区域的嘴, Laval 嘴,分叉的嘴和收敛的嘴。CDE 的粗野特定的推动变化 1 540-1 750 s 和集体流动每平方米范围 313-330 kg/(m2 敯慬瑳捩猠汯敶 ? 牡 ? 獵摥琠? 敤楳湧琠敨愠瑣癩? 潣瑮潲 ?慬w 吗?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue中国航空学报:英文版Same topicCombustion and Detonation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207