MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3150024363

Continuous Detonation Engine and Effects of Different Types of Nozzle on Its Propulsion Performance

2010· article· en· W3150024363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue中国航空学报:英文版 · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPropulsionDetonationNozzleAutomotive engineeringAeronauticsEnvironmental scienceAerospace engineeringEngineeringChemistryExplosive material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

有嘴的不同类型的一台连续爆炸引擎(CDE ) 的旋转繁殖用一个一步舞化学药品反应模型在三维的数字模拟被调查。流动术语被所谓的保存 monotonicity 解决加权实质上非摆动(MPWENO ) 计划。模仿的流动地与以前的试验性的结果同意很好。一旦起始的短暂效果减弱,只要燃料连续地被注射,爆炸波浪在环形的房间维持连续摆动的繁殖。用一块数字流动地, CDE 的推进表演为嘴的四种类型被计算,也就是经常区域的嘴, Laval 嘴,分叉的嘴和收敛的嘴。CDE 的粗野特定的推动变化 1 540-1 750 s 和集体流动每平方米范围 313-330 kg/(m2 敯慬瑳捩猠汯敶 ? 牡 ? 獵摥琠? 敤楳湧琠敨愠瑣癩? 潣瑮潲 ?慬w 吗?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it