Non‐conventional fungicides to control dollar spot disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There are strong societal pressures against the use of synthetic pesticides in our modern urban society. The purpose of this work was to test the efficacy of several substances, many of which are household use items and can be considered non‐conventional, for their ability to control the common turfgrass disease, dollar spot, in lab and field tests. From the over 10 lab tests per treatment and the over 10 field tests between 2015 to 2019, we concluded that among over 20 mostly non‐conventional products applied at different rates and intervals, only ferrous sulfate (21% a.i.) used at 250 g per 100 m 2 or ferric sulfate (84.5% a.i.) used at 300 g per 100 m 2 applied in 10 L of water per 100 m 2 on a weekly basis could provide suppression of dollar spot disease on creeping bentgrass equivalent to a standard fungicide control during periods of low to moderate disease pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".