LA COMUNICACION PERIODISTICA Y LA RELACION DE ASIMETRIA EN EL PROCESO DE INTEGRACION DEL MERCOSUR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article considers the impact of territorial size of a nation in its socioeconomic and political fate through the analysis of news communication. This issue is studied in relation with the Mercosur regional treaty: what is the upshot of the remarkable asymmetry between the partners of this geopolitical union? The journalistic discourse that involves different socio-political actors of the region is analysed to understand the actual meaning of this agreement. How plausible is the concept of Mercosur in print news communication? The hypothesis is that there are two opposed rhetorical tendencies in the media discourse on the treatise: one construes and orients the process towards a symmetrical ideal between the partners; the other underlines the asymmetry of the territorial power, and thus favours the conflict and the eventual collapse of the regional block. The article aims at understanding the reference of the complex notion of Mercosur, through the study of the media discourse that some of its main actors produce.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".