MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3150266788 · doi:10.1109/iccad.2007.4397334

Sparse and passive reduction of massively coupled large multiport interconnects

2007· article· en· W3150266788 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigest of technical papers/Digest of technical papers - IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReduction (mathematics)Massively parallelComputer scienceWaveformInterconnectionLimitingModel order reductionPort (circuit theory)Parallel computingAlgorithmElectronic engineeringTopology (electrical circuits)MathematicsTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large number of ports in an interconnect struc- ture is a critical limiting factor when applying model-order reduction. This is due to the fact that the size of the reduced model grows rapidly with increasing the number of ports, lead- ing to large and dense circuit matrices. To address this problem, a novel method based on transverse partitioning and waveform relaxation is proposed for passive model-order reduction of massively coupled large multiport interconnects. The new method effectively replaces the tightly coupled multiport reduced model with decoupled 2-port subcircuits. In addition to preserving the advantages of model-order reduction, the compu- tational complexity of the new method grows only linearly with the number of lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it