Continuity and Change of Political Culture: Study on Scientific Insights and Political Understanding on Politicians of Political Parties in Indonesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AbstractThe research problem formulated as follows: (1) How does scientific insight and understanding of politician toward political? (2) In the form of what are the politicians express that understanding and insight in the practice of party politics? This study used a qualitative approach, which is to collect data through interviews (in-depth interview) to politicians of political party. Once the data collected, it will be analyzed using descriptive qualitative method. In conclusion this study will produce a thick description about political understanding of the politicians of political party and how their mission and how they apply that understanding in political practice in the field. After doing research, the results are as follows: (1) in general the party politician of Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP), the Democratic Party (Demokrat), People's Conscience Party (Hanura), Indonesia Movement Party (Gerindra), Party group work (Golkar) and National Mandate Party (PAN), a political understanding on a practical level, the party associated with the movement (low politics), (2) For PDIP, a political party that is a party and it is a place to formally take power through elections. This is similar to what was said by politicians that the Democrats are the party. A political party is a means of struggle and the party is to fight for the people's movement. For Hanura politician, political parties are organized in the form of containers struggle to realize the ideals. Hanura similar to the above statement, Golkar politician understand that is a political party or be used as a means of mobilizing the masses by way of approach or method appropriate for support to fight for the ideals or desires appropriate to the mass itself. Gerindra understand political cadres are a political party as a means of fighting for the ideals of the nation embodied in the Pancasila Indonesia. Last informant is politicians of a national mandate party (PAN). Unlike the previous, PAN officials said that is not just a mass movement, party, and popular movements to another. More than that is the willingness to establish justice and equality, and to realize a religious democratic.Keywords: scientific insight, politics, political party1. IntroductionIn conceptual level and political practice is much different. In constitutional history, political understanding is constantly changing. In the study of political science, political scientists distinguish the meaning of general and special. The word politics is derived from the word politics which indicates a personal nature or acts. Lexically, the origin of the word means acting or judging wisely, well judges, prudent. The word is drawn from the Latin word and Greek which means politicos Relating to a citizen. The second word is also derived from the word polis which means city.Political sense mentioned above is more general in nature. Judging from the context of his activities, according to a simple survey of the political activists who do not represent the statement as a whole-they see the political perspective that simple. Besides, because of the educational background and knowledge of is not enough, as well as interests and goals plunge in just for a specific purpose, such as the wish to be politicians, participants, administrators, legislators, and or the other, so it is more seen as a political partisan activity.In the above context, it is interesting to do a study of the political party politician regarding their scientific' insights and understanding on politics. So that it can be acquired academic knowledge and the academic quality of the political actors who have an impact, particularly on governance and the state in general. Based on the reasons stated above. The research problem can be formulated as follows: (1) How does scientific insight and understanding of politician toward political? …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".