Bibliographic record
Abstract
Telgemeier, Raina, and Stephanie Yue. Smile. New York: Graphix-Scholastic, 2010. Print.The book I chose was Smile by Raina Telgemeier, published by Graphix. The book was about a girl named Raina who is in grade 6. One night after girl scouts her and her friends were racing to her front porch, and she severely injured her two front teeth. What follows is a long and frustrating journey with, on-again braces and other crazy things. I liked that the book is a comic book and not a chapter book. It's a really good book and it also won an award for the book. I also like that it's kind of a diary about Raina but it's also about her family. What I did not like about the book is I wish the book was longer because I like the book. Also I wish there was a little bit more words in the book. I would give the book: 5 stars out of 5. I would recommend the book to kids that are same age as me. Kids that are a little younger than me would also like it though.Highly Recommended: 5 out of 5 starsReviewer: HarlieMy name is Harlie. I love reading fairytale, mystery, and horror books. I don’t like non-fiction books because I think they are boring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".