MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3150322863 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.2011.6232743

Dielectric response of various partially cured epoxy nanocomposites

2011· article· en· W3150322863 on OpenAlexafffund
I. Preda, H. Couderc, M. Frechette, S. Savoie, Fengge Gao, Rinat Nigmatullin, Simon Thompson, J. Castellon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureHydro-Québec
FundersHydro-Québec
KeywordsEpoxyMaterials scienceDielectricComposite materialCuring (chemistry)Rigidity (electromagnetism)NanocompositeHumidityUltrasonic sensorAcousticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the post-treatment importance using dielectric measurements on nanocomposites. During this post-treatment which is the application of heat over time, crosslinking completes and ageing sets in. Both effects usually take place in the same time. Besides the expected differences between the filled and unfilled epoxy samples, the influence of silane coupling agents and the use of ultrasonic waves on the clay was demonstrated. Since the samples used in the experiment were unusually soft, supposedly because of the insufficient initial curing (4h at 100°C), a total of 38 h of heat treatment was applied, after which an improvement of the mechanical rigidity was noticed. This heat treatment was also considered extremely useful in order to remove humidity from the samples volume. Comparing the results obtained for two samples, with and without the 38h of post treatment, the treated sample was found to have a more stable dielectric response at 20°C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207