MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3150323359 · doi:10.4021/jmc151w

Fish Bone Perforation Mimicking Acute Appendicitis

2011· article· en· W3150323359 on OpenAlex
Almoudaris

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicForeign Body Medical Cases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFish bonePerforationAppendixSurgeryFish <Actinopterygii>Bowel resectionAppendicitisBowel perforationResectionRadiologyComplication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fish bone ingestion is relatively common, however, resultant perforation of the small bowel is fortunately rare. We present a case of a 48-year-old gentleman who attended our emergency department complaining of severe, unrelenting right lower abdominal pain for the preceding five hours. CT scanning suggested a perforated appendix however at operation the appendix was normal. Several loops of small bowel walling off an inter-loop abscess and a fishbone were discovered in the washout fluid. A diagnosis of small bowel fish bone perforation was made intra-operatively and the patient subsequently made a full recovery without the need for bowel resection. We present this as a rare case of small bowel perforation by a fish bone where the site of perforation was unidentifiable but was treated successfully without the need for bowel resection. J Med Cases. 2011;2(6):296-299 doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jmc151w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it