MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 19564: Short Term Improvement in Subtle Cardiac Dysfunction in Severely Obese Patients After Bariatric Surgery is Not Associated With Changes in Nt-pro-bnp: A Speckle Tracking Study

2015· article· en· W3150331967 on OpenAlexaff
Marcela Rodríguez-Flores, Julie Martin, Paul Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyVentricleSubclinical infectionBody mass indexSpeckle tracking echocardiographyDiastoleCardiac function curveSurgeryHeart failureEjection fractionBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objective: The impact of bariatric surgery on sub-clinical alteration of cardiac function assessed using speckle-tracking strain and its relationship with metabolic changes is unknown. We assessed in obese patients with normal left ventricle (LV) systolic function who underwent the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS); 1) prevalence of subclinical cardiac dysfunction and dyssynchrony in comparison with gender-matched subjects and, 2) the impact of bariatric surgery on myocardial function and its association with changes in NT-proBNP levels and insulin sensitivity. Methods: Prospective, observational study of the effect of BPD-DS after six months on strain, strain rate (SR) and displacement curves using a repeated measures mixed linear regression model analysis. Changes in systolic (LV end-systolic dimension, longitudinal strain) and diastolic (E/A, ESr) parameters were correlated with changes in body mass index (BMI), HOMA and NT-proBNP. Results: Thirty-eight severely obese patients (BMI 48.4±7.4 Kg/m 2 ) had decreased longitudinal strain (-17.0±2.5%) in comparison with 20 patients without obesity (-19.7±1.5%) (p<0.001), which was comparable to controls after surgery (19.3±1.8%) at a mean BMI of 35.7±6 mg/m 2 . Eighteen patients (47%) had a global longitudinal strain considered clinically abnormal. Following surgery, 94% of these patients improved their LV mechanics, with normalization of their global longitudinal strain (p<0.001). Changes in longitudinal strain were not related with changes in NT-proBNP or improvement in insulin sensitivity. Conclusions: There is significant subclinical cardiac dysfunction in patients with severe obesity with normal systolic function. Improvement in longitudinal strain after surgery was not explained by improved insulin sensitivity or changes in NT-proBNP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207