Multimodal surface-wave tomography to obtain S- and P-wave velocities applied to the recordings of unmanned aerial vehicle deployed sensors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Exploration seismic surveys in hard-to-access areas such as foothills and forests are extremely challenging. The Multiphysics Exploration Technologies Integrated System (METIS) research project was initiated to design an exploration system, facilitating the acquisition in these areas by delivering the receivers from the sky using unmanned aerial vehicles. Air dropping of the sensors in vegetated areas results in an irregular geometry for the acquisition. This irregularity can limit the application of conventional surface wave methods. We have developed a surface wave workflow for estimating the S-wave velocity (VS) and P-wave velocity (VP) models and that supports the irregular geometry of the deployed sources and receivers. The method consists of a multimodal surface-wave tomography (SWT) technique to compute the VS model and a data transform method (the wavelength/depth [W/D] method) to determine the Poisson’s ratio and VP model. We applied the method to the METIS’s first pilot records, which were acquired in the forest of Papua New Guinea. Application of SWT to the data resulted in the first 90 m of the VS model. The W/D method provided the Poisson’s ratio averaged over the area and the VP model between 10 and 70 m from the surface. The impact of the acquisition scale and layout on the resolution of the estimated model and the advantages of including the higher modes of surface waves in the tomographic inversion are assessed in detail. The presence of shots from diverse site locations significantly improves the resolution of the obtained model. Including the higher modes enhances the data coverage and increases the investigation depth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".