MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3150705045 · doi:10.14740/jmc2654w

Concomitant Crown and Piece of Tray Ingestion: A Case Report

2016· article· en· W3150705045 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yuh Baba, Yukio Kato

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicForeign Body Medical Cases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIngestionForeign bodyForeign Body IngestionConcomitantAccidentalCrown (dentistry)Foreign BodiesDentistrySurgeryMedical emergencyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ingestion of a foreign body is a complication often seen in the hospital emergency rooms. The dental university hospital, where instruments and products are manipulated in the mouth, is an environment of risk. Previously, accidental foreign body ingestion during a routine dental procedure was reported by different groups. However, ingestion of multiple foreign bodies during a routine dental impression procedure is uncommon. Here, we describe a clinical case of accidental ingestion of concomitant crown and piece of tray. Some clinical implications are discussed, mainly emphasizing the care needed to prevent such an accident. J Med Cases. 2016;7(11):478-479 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jmc2654w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicForeign Body Medical CasesFrench-language works237,207