MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3150790461 · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.013

Progressive myoclonus epilepsies—Residual unsolved cases have marked genetic heterogeneity including dolichol-dependent protein glycosylation pathway genes

2021· article· en· W3150790461 on OpenAlexaff
Carolina Courage, Karen Oliver, Eon Joo Park, Jillian M. Cameron, Kariona A. Grabińska, Mikko Muona, Laura Canafoglia, Antonio Gambardella, Edith Said, Zaid Afawi, Betül Baykan, Christian Brandt, Carlo Di Bonaventura, Hui Bein Chew, Chiara Criscuolo, Leanne M. Dibbens, Barbara Castellotti, P. Riguzzi, Angelo Labate, Alessandro Filla, Anna Teresa Giallonardo, Géza Berecki, Christopher B. Jackson, Tarja Joensuu, John A. Damiano, Sara Kivity, Amos D. Korczyn, Aarno Palotie, Pasquale Striano, Davide Uccellini, Loretta Giuliano, Eva Andermann, Ingrid E. Scheffer, Roberto Michelucci, Melanie Bahlo, Silvana Franceschetti, William C. Sessa, Samuel F. Berkovic, Anna‐Elina Lehesjoki

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Human Genetics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research CouncilState Government of VictoriaHelsinki Institute of Life Science, Helsingin YliopistoNational Institutes of HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungHelsingin Yliopisto
KeywordsDolicholGlycosylationGeneMyoclonusGeneticsN-linked glycosylationBiologyGlycoproteinMedicineNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicGlycogen Storage Diseases and MyoclonusFrench-language works237,207