Combined Atlas and Convolutional Neural Network-Based Segmentation of the Hippocampus from MRI According to the ADNI Harmonized Protocol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hippocampus atrophy is an early structural feature that can be measured from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve the diagnosis of neurological diseases. An accurate and robust standardized hippocampus segmentation method is required for reliable atrophy assessment. The aim of this work was to develop and evaluate an automatic segmentation tool (DeepHarp) for hippocampus delineation according to the ADNI harmonized hippocampal protocol (HarP). DeepHarp utilizes a two-step process. First, the approximate location of the hippocampus is identified in T1-weighted MRI datasets using an atlas-based approach, which is used to crop the images to a region-of-interest (ROI) containing the hippocampus. In the second step, a convolutional neural network trained using datasets with corresponding manual hippocampus annotations is used to segment the hippocampus from the cropped ROI. The proposed method was developed and validated using 107 datasets with manually segmented hippocampi according to the ADNI-HarP standard as well as 114 multi-center datasets of patients with Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, cerebrovascular disease, and healthy controls. Twenty-three independent datasets manually segmented according to the ADNI-HarP protocol were used for testing to assess the accuracy, while an independent test-retest dataset was used to assess precision. The proposed DeepHarp method achieved a mean Dice similarity score of 0.88, which was significantly better than four other established hippocampus segmentation methods used for comparison. At the same time, the proposed method also achieved a high test-retest precision (mean Dice score: 0.95). In conclusion, DeepHarp can automatically segment the hippocampus from T1-weighted MRI datasets according to the ADNI-HarP protocol with high accuracy and robustness, which can aid atrophy measurements in a variety of pathologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".