Global journalism research: theories, methods, findings, future
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Notes on Contributors. Part I: Introduction to Research. 1. Questioning National, Cultural and Disciplinary Boundaries: A Call for Global Research: David Weaver (Indiana University, Bloomington) and Martin Loffelholz (Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany). Part II: Theories of Research. 2. Heterogeneous - Multi-dimensional - Competing: Theoretical Approaches on - an Overview: Martin Loffelholz (Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany). 3. in a Globalizing World Society: A Societal Approach to Research: Manfred Ruhl (University of Bamberg). 4. as a Human Right: The Cultural Approach to Journalism: John Hartley (Queensland University of Technology). 5. The Structure of News Production: The Organizational Approach to Research: Klaus-Dieter Altmeppen (Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany). 6. Factors Behind Journalists' Professional Behavior: A Psychological Approach to Research: Wolfgang Donsbach (Dresden University, Germany). 7. Jounalism as a Symbolic Practice - The Gender Approach in Research: Gertrude J. Robinson (McGill University, Montreal). Part III: Methodology and Methods of Research. 8. Comparing across Cultural Boundaries: State-of-the-art, Strategies, Problems, and Solutions: Thomas Hanitzsch (University of Zurich). 9. Methods of Research-Survey: David Weaver (Indiana University, Bloomington). 10. Methods of Research - Content Analysis: Christian Kolmer (Media Tenor Institute, Bonn). 11. Methods of Research: Observation: Thorsten Quandt (Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Germany). Part IV: Selected Paradigms and Findings of Research. 12. Research in the United States: Paradigm Shift in Times of Globalization: Jane B. Singer (University of Iowa). 13. Research in Germany: Evolution and Central Research Interests: Siegfried Weischenberg (Hamburg University, Germany) and Maja Malik (University of Munster, Germany). 14. Research in the UK: From Isolated Efforts to an Established Discipline: Karin Wahl-Jorgensen and Bob Franklin. 15. South African Research: Challenging Paradigmatic Schisms and Finding a Foothold in an Era of Globalization: Arnold S. de Beer (Stellenbosch University, South Africa). 16. Research in Greater China: Its Communities, Approaches, and Themes: Joseph Man Chan (University of Hong Kong), Ven-hwei Lo (National Chengchi University, Taiwan), and Zhongdang Pan (University of Wisconsin-Madison). 17. Research in Mexico: Historical Development and Research Interests in the Latin American Context: Maria Elena Hernandez Ramirez (University of Guadalajara) and Andreas Schwarz (Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany). Part V: The Future of Research. 18. Re-Considering Journalism for Research: Ari Heinonen (University of Tampere, Finland) and Heikki Luostarinen (University of Tampere, Finland). 19. Theorizing a Globalized Journalism: Stephen D. Reese (University of Texas at Austin). 20. Going Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries in the Future of Research: Barbie Zelizer (University of Pennsylvania). 21. Education in an Era of Globalization: Mark Deuze (Indiana University, Bloomington). Part VI: Conclusions. 22. Research: Summing Up and Looking Ahead: Martin Loffelholz (Ilmenau University of Technology, Germany) and David Weaver (Indiana University, Bloomington). Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.036 | 0.041 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.053 | 0.018 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".