Effective Optical Properties of Ultrathin Gold Coatings Investigated by Tilted Fiber Bragg Grating
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tilted fiber Bragg grating (TFBG)-based refractometers are inexpensive, compact, lightweight, and immune to electromagnetic interference and have high chemical resistance.In recent years, many kinds of metal films-coated TFBG refractometers were investigated for enhancing the surrounding refractive index (SRI) measurement sensitivity, resulting from the several orders of My deepest gratitude goes first and foremost to my supervisor Prof. Jacques Albert, who accepted me from China to his group as a PhD candidate when seldom would have.I have been really fortunate for getting the chance to learn and work with one so kind to everyone but also distinguished on science research.Without his enlightening instruction, impressive patience and consistent encourage, I cannot understand the real research and insist on the high quality of science research.I am grateful to him for indebting me greatly to make the going forward and forward with no fear.I am also grateful to him for walking me through the stages to become a better scientist and a better man.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".