MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3151288324

Recent Progress in Optical Fiber Sensors Based on Brillouin Scattering at University of Ottawa

2011· article· en· W3151288324 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaoyi, Bao, Liang Liang, Chen

Bibliographic record

Venue光子传感器:英文版 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrillouin scatteringOptical fiberFiberFiber optic sensorOpticsEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceEngineering physicsPhysicsComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

分布式的传感器被证明是一个强大的工具为民用结构并且监视的材料过程。在纤维散布的 Brillouin 能被用作点传感器或为分布式的传感器为点传感器或脉搏长度在厘米(Brillouin 栅栏长度) 上为温度,紧张, birefringence 和颤动的测量散布了传感器。有 20 厘米的空间分辨率的同时的紧张和温度测量与温度精确性和 0.4 的紧张精确性用 Brillouin 栅栏技术在熊猫纤维被表明吗??

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.392
Threshold uncertainty score0.779

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue光子传感器:英文版Same topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207