MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3151308163

What Do Employers Want? Views of Chinese and Canadian Job Seekers

2006· article· en· W3151308163 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ying Ying, Сун, Chan, James James, Tiessen

Bibliographic record

Venue中国与世界经济:英文版 · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotional Intelligence and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeekersPublic relationsBusinessPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

快速的全球化为管理导致了跨文化的问题和他们的含意的许多研究。作为中国在国际经济上升的重要性,国际企业合作的水平继续增加。这份报纸首先在进入工作市场的汉语和加拿大人的文化取向识别差别然后当雇用时,检验这些取向怎么与他们标准老板使用的感觉有关。分析证明文化差别不与 Hofstede 的家一致以前的工作。进一步,当寻求一个工作时,在被认为重要的质量有重要差别。这研究的结果增加相互的理解并且改进在二个国家之间的企业关系。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue中国与世界经济:英文版Same topicEmotional Intelligence and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207