MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3151382256

EARLY ORDOVICIAN CHITINOZOANS FROM THE HONGHUAYUANFORMATION AND LOWER PART OF MEITAN FORMATION INDATANGKOU OF CHENGKOU, CHONGQING

2005· article· en· W3151382256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiao Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueGushengwu xuebao · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrdovicianConodontPaleontologyGeologyCarbonateBiostratigraphySequence (biology)BiologyChemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The Ordovician sequence is complete and well exposed at Datangkou of Chengkou County, Chongqing City. The investigation has been carried out on chitinozoans, together with the graptolites and conodonts, from the Honghuayuan Formation and the Yingpan Member of the Meitan Formation which represents the late Early Ordovician and early Middle Ordovician in the eastern Dabashan, belonging to the north Yangtze carbonate platform. For this study thirty-five chitinozoan samples were collected so that a stratigraphical control can be expected based on graptolite or conodont zones in this interval. Chitinozoans are lacking in eleven samples while in others are abundant but poorly diversified. A total of seventeen species, three new species (Conochitina datangkouensis sp. nov., C.wengxigouensis sp. nov., Rhabdochitina chenkouense sp. nov.) included, belonging to six genera have been described and figured. Among the key species recorded, the FAD of Lagenochitina esthonica, C. poumoti, C. brevis and ?Eremochitina brevis allow biostratigraphical correlation with graptolite zones of the same section and chitinozoan zones from Quebec, Bohemia, and south-eastern Europe. Yet, we must emphasize the absence of the typical Conochitina symmetrica which is unrecorded in the Honghuayuan Formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGushengwu xuebaoSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207