MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

From Brain to Blood Vessel: Insights From Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Recordings

2021· review· en· W3151445067 on OpenAlexaff
John S. Floras

Bibliographic record

VenueHypertension · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroneurographyMedicineBlood pressureObstructive sleep apneaInternal medicineSympathetic nervous systemBaroreflexCardiologyHypoxia (environmental)Heart rate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiunit recordings of postganglionic sympathetic outflow to muscle yield otherwise imperceptible insights into sympathetic neural modulation of human vascular resistance and blood pressure. This Corcoran Lecture will illustrate the utility of microneurography to investigate neurogenic cardiovascular regulation; review data concerning muscle sympathetic nerve activity of women and men with normal and high blood pressure; explore 2 concepts, central upregulation of muscle sympathetic outflow and cortical autonomic neuroplasticity; present sleep apnea as an imperfect model of neurogenic hypertension; and expose the paradox of sympathetic excitation without hypertension. In awake healthy normotensive individuals, resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity increases with age, sleep fragmentation, and obstructive apnea. Its magnitude is not signaled by heart rate. Age-related changes are nonlinear and differ by sex. In men, sympathetic nerve activity increases with age but without relation to their blood pressure, whereas in women, both rise concordantly after age 40. Mean values for muscle sympathetic nerve activity burst incidence are consistently higher in cohorts with hypertension than in matched normotensives, yet women's sympathetic nerve traffic can increase 3-fold between ages 30 and 70 without causing hypertension. Thus, increased sympathetic nerve activity may be necessary but is insufficient for primary hypertension. Moreover, its inhibition does not consistently decrease blood pressure. Despite a half-century of microneurographic research, large gaps remain in our understanding of the content of the sympathetic broadcast from brain to blood vessel and its specific individual consequences for circulatory regulation and cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHypertensionSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207