MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3151655794 · doi:10.1080/15481603.2021.1906056

The synergistic use of microwave coarse-scale measurements and two adopted high-resolution indices driven from long-term T-V scatter plot for fine-scale soil moisture estimation

2021· article· en· W3151655794 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Farzane Mohseni, Mehdi Mokhtarzade

Bibliographic record

VenueGIScience & Remote Sensing · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDownscalingWater contentEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingMoistureRadiometerMean squared errorSoil scienceScale (ratio)Correlation coefficientMicrowaveMeteorologyMathematicsGeographyStatisticsGeologyPrecipitationComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an attempt to retrieve soil moisture content (SMC) from remote sensing techniques, this article suggests and evaluates a developed approach that overcomes three of the most fundamental limitations of the temperature–vegetation (T-V) scatter plot method that are (1) low accuracy of the T-V scatter plot method in cases that the corresponding scatter plot and its wet and dry edges are not formed appropriately, (2) incompatibility of the T-V index maps in different days, and (3) inability to obtain the absolute SMC values from the T-V indices. The research consists of three main steps. In the first step, the measurements of eight global in situ SMC networks were applied to select the most appropriate and accurate microwave remote sensing mission among from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2, Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity, and Soil Moisture Active Passive. The results outlined the superiority of SMAP’s products in terms of RMSE and correlation coefficient (root mean square difference (RMSE) = 0.3–0.12 m3/m3 and R = 0.53–0.93). At the second step, the 1-year T-V scatter plot was formed and then, two adopted soil moisture indices, namely the annual soil moisture index (ASMIHR) and daily soil moisture index (DSMIHR), were extracted. The ASMIHR was driven from the annual wet and dry edges and a novel concept called “co-moisture line” was introduced to obtain the DSMIHR. In the third step of the proposed method, Disaggregation based on Physical and Theoretical scale Change was applied as the downscaling algorithm with a novelty to identify the parameter of partial derivative of microwave data relative to SMC indices using the relationship between ASMIHR and coarse-scale SMAP pixels. Across four SMAP coarse-scale pixels located in the study area, the corresponding parameter was obtained with the average correlation coefficient 0.7. This step was followed by integrating DSMIHR and SMAP products to provide absolute SMC values at intermediate spatial resolution. The proposed method was evaluated on the agricultural site of Soil Moisture Active Passive Validation Experiment 2016-Manitoba. The ultimate results of the proposed method in terms of absolute SMC values proved promising consistency with field measurements (R = 0.66 and no-bias RMSE = 0.06 m3/m3).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGIScience & Remote SensingSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207