MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3151773677 · doi:10.1360/sste-2020-0272

地球三极<bold>200hPa</bold>温度的协同变化特征

2021· article· zh· W3151773677 on OpenAlexaff
克艳 方, 鹏 张, 镜明 陈, 德亮 陈

Bibliographic record

VenueSCIENTIA SINICA Terrae · 2021
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Regulatory Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmpereInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicinePhysicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

地球的三极, 即北极、南极和第三极(即青藏高原及其周围地区), 拥有地球上最大储量的淡水资源. 地球三极均对气候的变化响应敏感, 然而三极气候变化之间的关联, 特别是南极和第三极之间的关联却知之甚少. 在200hPa高度, 夏季气温在地球三极的上空最高, 且受地表条件影响较小, 可能反映出大尺度的气候动态关联特征. 地球三极的温度在年代际时间尺度(10~100年)上表现出同相变化特征, 北极和南极上空200hPa处的温度与布鲁尔-多布森环流(BDC)显著相关, 这可能是由于布鲁尔-多布森环流将平流层臭氧向南北极输送, 并同步加热了南北极200hPa处的空气. 我们发现在第三极的对流层顶变暖增强了向两极的, 特别是向南极的, 布鲁尔-多布森环流输送, 由此将第三极的气候与南北极气候联系起来. 此外, 太平洋年代际涛动(IPO)也显示出与三极200hPa处温度的关联.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0680.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSCIENTIA SINICA TerraeSame topicLegal and Regulatory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207