Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dalam bidang Pendidikan Agama Islam, perencanaan merupakan salah satu faktor penting dalam kegiatan pendidikan demi tercapainya tujuan pendidikan yang diharapkan bagi setiap jenjang dan jenis pendidikan pada tingkat nasional maupun lokal. Pentingnya perencanaan yang baik dalam bidang Pendidikan Agama Islam karena jika tidak ada perencanaan yang matang pelaksanaan suatu kegiatan akan mengalami kesulitan dan bahkan mengalami kegagalan dalam mencapai tujuan yang diinginkan. Oleh karena itu Pendidikan Agama Islamnsebagai jalan hidup manusia yang paling baik perlu direncanakan secara baik dan sistematis. Harapannya Pendidikan Agama Islam benar-benar dapat merasuk ke dalam jiwa setiap Muslim, terutama pada anak-anak usia sekolah. Namun penerapan Pendidikan Agama Islam di lembaga pendidikan umum merupakan suatu tantangan tersendiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami dan menganalisis perencanaan pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dengan baik untuk mewujudkan tujuan pendidikan Nasional
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.396 | 0.250 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".