MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152047122 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2012.2222915

Macromodeling of Distributed Networks From Frequency-Domain Data Using the Loewner Matrix Approach

2012· article· en· W3152047122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency domainComputer scienceTransmission lineDistributed element modelDomain (mathematical analysis)Matrix (chemical analysis)Time domainElectronic engineeringTransmission (telecommunications)Topology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, Loewner matrix (LM)-based methods were introduced for generating time-domain macromodels based on frequency-domain measured parameters. These methods were shown to be very efficient and accurate for lumped systems with a large number of ports; however, they were not suitable for distributed transmission-line networks. In this paper, an LM-based approach is proposed for modeling distributed networks. The new method was shown to be efficient and accurate for large-scale distributed networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.514

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it