Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is Associated With Superior Psychological Health and Quality of Life in Males but Not in Females
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves psychological health and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). Yet, available evidence suggests that their degree of improvements following CR may depend on patient sex and the mode of revascularization. We examined the interplay between sex and mode of revascularization on the psychological health and HR-QoL of patients completing CR. METHODS: We analyzed the longitudinal records of patients who completed a 3-mo outpatient CR program following coronary revascularization. Levels of anxiety and depression were measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and HR-QoL was measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 before and after CR. A two-by-two analysis of covariance (females vs males by coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG] vs percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) was used to examine the sex-by-revascularization procedure interaction effect on changes in psychological health and HR-QoL. RESULTS: Of the 278 participants (age: 65 ± 9 yr) included in the analysis, 191 (69%) underwent PCI and 55 (20%) were females. Following CR, there was a significant sex-by-revascularization procedure interaction effect on anxiety (P = .033) and mental HR-QoL (mental component summary [MCS]; P = .040). Following CABG, females and males showed similar improvements in anxiety (-1.3 ± 3.4 vs -1.1 ± 3.6 points, P = .460) and MCS scores (5.4 ± 8.9 vs 4.5 ± 8.7 points, P = .887); following PCI, females experienced worse anxiety levels and mental component summary scores while males showed improvements (anxiety: +1.0 ± 3.8 vs -1.3 ± 3.8 points, P = .002; MCS: -1.6 ± 9.3 vs + 4.4 ± 8.9 points, P = .008, respectively). There was no interaction effect on depression. CONCLUSIONS: Continued efforts are required to improve anxiety and mental HR-QoL in females treated with PCI participating in CR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".