MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152310828 · doi:10.1109/ojap.2021.3066304

Superlens Enhanced 2-D Microwave Tomography With Contrast Source Inversion Method

2021· article· en· W3152310828 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInverse problemOpticsTomographyComputer scienceMicrowave imagingLens (geology)InverseConjugate gradient methodInversion (geology)MicrowavePhysicsAlgorithmMathematicsGeologyTelecommunicationsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The contrast source inversion (CSI) algorithm is one of the primary techniques used for solution of non-linear inverse problems in microwave tomography. In this paper, we describe a modification of the CSI method adapted to imaging of the 2-D objects in the presence of the focusing media under TM-polarization. The focusing media is presented in the form of the Veselago lens. The data domain and imaging domain are properly positioned with respect to the location of the lens. Specifically, the sensors are located at the focal points of the lens with respect to the location of the individual pixels discretizing the contrast source. Such positioning of the source and observation locations in the presence of the lens, eliminates rank deficiency in the formulation of the inverse problem and results in significant improvements to both convergence speed of underlying conjugate gradient iterations and the accuracy of the image reconstruction in the CSI method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it