MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3152381521 · doi:10.4021/wjnu67w

Primary Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma in a Female Urethral Diverticulum: A Case Report and Review

2013· article· en· W3152381521 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sheahan

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Nephrology and Urology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClear-cell adenocarcinomaMedicineUrethral diverticulumCytokeratinMalignancyPathologyAdenocarcinomaUrologyClear cellRadiologyCarcinomaCancerInternal medicineUrethraImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma is a very rare variant of lower urinary tract malignancy. We present a 54 years old lady who presented with haematuria and a urethral mass on ultrasound. MRI subsequently demonstrated a heterogeneous mass within a urethral diverticulum. Biopsies of the mass demonstrated clear cell adenocarcinoma with clearing of the cytoplasm, moderate nuclear pleomorphism. Immunohistochemically cells were positive for: cytokeratin 7 and p16, p53, CA125, CAM5.2, AE1/AE3. They were negative for: thrombomodulin, oestrogen, progesterone, cytokeratin 20, p63, CD10, CEAP, WT1, AFP, s100. She underwent anterior exenteration with pelvic lymphadenectomy, and ileal conduit formation. Histology of which demonstrated surgically clear margins but 3/6 positive lymph nodes. She underwent 50.4Gy for consolidative radiotherapy given the lack of known benefit for chemotherapy. Subsequent PET scans have demonstrated lymphatic disease progression, but remains alive one year after diagnosis. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/wjnu67w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Nephrology and UrologySame topicUrinary and Genital Oncology StudiesFrench-language works237,207